kangeiko: (Default)
kangeiko ([personal profile] kangeiko) wrote2005-06-15 02:08 am
Entry tags:

Middle of 'Hourglass'

OK, so it's half an hour before Sloane gets executed. Except that, well, last conversation with Jack? Not so much.

Here's the way it plays out in my head -

Hourglass
Episode filler for Hourglass. Jack and Arvin share a drink.



*

So, what's the betting the execution gets delayed or Jack changes his mind?

In fact, I'm going with Jack changing his mind. Because he owns Sloane. And no one - no one - harms what belongs to Jack, even if he's just saving them for the pleasure of hurting them himself. If Sloane dies in any way other than stabbed or strangled by Jack, he's going to be exceedingly surprised. Irina, too. Dead by jack's hands or not at all, and that's just the end of it. And, yes, I can just see Laura smiling a little, "You should be careful, Arvin. Jack collects people who love him."

ETA: OMG OMG Some days you are just right!!! *jaw drop*

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2005-06-16 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
You're welcome.*g*

If only he weren't so oblivious to himself, he'd understand how that actually came out. I want to march in there and wave Freud in his face.

Wait till you hear him say to Sloane "Give me one good reason why I shouldn't do to you what I did to my wife". In the men's room, no less.

If you ask me, Jack's obliviousness has a lot to do with the fact that he doesn't consider himself lovable or worthy of love. Certainly not since Laura turned out to be Irina. (Before that, he was open enough emotionally to write sappy dedications on books, after all.) And that he tells himself that he doesn't want or need anyone's affection but Sydney's.

I think that Dixon puts up with a lot of faff and angst. I'd have beaten them with the 'sense' stick years back.

You mean back in the SD6 days when they were his bosses? *g* Also, let's not forget: Dixon loathes Sloane because of the death of Diane. Yes, I think he meant it when he told Sloane that he prayed Sloane would find peace, because Dixon is a good man, but that was with the prospect of Sloane dying. A living Sloane is a different matter.

I have yet to read Sloane&Jack (or Sloane/Jack, for that matter) where Sydney features in any great way. I think that her reaction to their dynamic would be fabulous, especially as we tend to find out important things either through her eyes or pointedly not.

True. Of course she has her own strong dynamic with Sloane. (Something which in turn Jack ignores as best he can.) As far as show canon goes, I think her pov on that relationship changes a bit. In early season 3, she rather confidently tells Sloane "you'll never have my trust, or my father's friendship and respect", and this is not three episodes before Jack and Sloane work together again. In season 4... well, you'll see. To put as unspoilery as possible, some of Sydney's actions prove that she does believe in Sloane's feelings for Jack at least. Mind you, as in "friendship". And in season 3 she's aware that (pre-Irina revelation) Jack doesn't share her hatred for Sloane.

Mind you, in general I think Sydney prefers not to think about Sloane and either of her parents at all. But her subconscious, to which we get another trip in the early season 4 episode "Nocturne", does some fascinating things with Jack and Sloane. You'll see.