kangeiko: (Default)
[personal profile] kangeiko
LJ have a response for us.

Some other things they said in the comments.

OK, that settles it. I, for one, do not want to be associated with a site that views pro-anorexia communities as something that fits within LJ's grand vision (despite them being in violation of the ToS, btw!), but deems two 17 yo boys having sex as 'obscene' and 'illegal'. Then denies homophobia by saying, "oh, but some of our best friends are gay!" Of course they are, LJ.

I don't know if I'm moving to GJ or IJ. Ideally, I'd like to get involved in the beta testing of Scribblit, the proposed fandom-driven journal. Either way, this is the straw, etc.

(xposted to all 3 journals.)

Date: 2007-08-08 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elspethsheir.livejournal.com
Thank you for the link to [livejournal.com profile] aura218's post. It bothers me so much that I fear the post may be deleted before I get a chance to read it all, and while there was a time a fear like that would strike me as paranoid, now it doesn't, in this environment.

If you do land up over at GJ, I'm there as elspethsheir as well.

Date: 2007-08-08 08:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenspanky.livejournal.com
Uh, I don't think they ever specifically referred to it being about gay/lesbian stuff, I'm pretty sure they are only talking about things that depict people under 18 (which, as they are based in California, they should be doing, since that is the law that applies to them and as they host our files, they are liable). And anorexia isn't against the law, even though it is more life threatening than drawings of underage couples (though not of photos of underage couples for obvious abuse reasons).

Not that I'm defending LJ, I think they were stupid to do this, but I can understand some of their points. HOWEVER, I vastly disagree with how they have gone about it. No warnings, and they target fandom and not [livejournal.com profile] shota? That 's so wrong. I don't get it. And I think enough people are making that case that they will back down. Hopefully.

Date: 2007-08-08 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenspanky.livejournal.com
I wasn't trying to convince you to stay, hon, you do what you gotta do. I guess because I'm out of the fanart/HP stuff that icked this whole thing off I feel more removed from it, since none of my stuff has minors in it at all. I agree they are totally hypocritical and I really want them to remove those sites. But I don't think LJ are homophobic, I think users are and LJ are bound by law (the contract we sign) to follow up on complaints and if they find underage stuff, to get rid of it. Although I do think they should give some damn warning first and not wait until after we've done the new paid accounts, the bastards. Humph.

I'm sitting on the fence at the mo, but may leap at any time.

Date: 2007-08-09 09:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenspanky.livejournal.com
Oh, honeybee. That's not good. Are you free on Sunday to meet up?

Profile

kangeiko: (Default)
kangeiko

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 21 Mar 2026 02:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios